When whites do violence — rape, murder, assault — how often do they choose black victims? Shouldn’t a nation of bigots target blacks most of the time? At least half of the time? Of course, it does not. When whites commit violence, they to it to blacks 2.4 percent of the time. Blacks, on the other hand, choose white victims more than half the time. [317]
In those cases in which the race of the killer is known, blacks kill twice as many whites as whites kill blacks. Black-on-white robberies and gang assaults are twenty-one times more common than white on black. In the case of gang robbery, blacks victimize whites fifty-two times more often than whites do blacks. [318]
The contrasts are even more stark in the case of interracial rape. Studies from the late 1950s showed that the vast majority of rapes were same-race offenses. Research in Philadelphia carried out in 1958 and 1960 indicated that of all rapes, only 3.2 percent were black-on-white assaults and 3.6 percent were white-on-black. Since that time, the proportion of black-on-white rapes has soared. In a 1974 study in Denver, 40 percent of all rapes were of whites by blacks, and not one case of white-on-black rape was found. In general, through the 1970s, black-on-white rape was at least ten times more common that white-on-black rape. [319]
Because interracial rape is now overwhelmingly black on white, it has become difficult to do research on it or to find relevant statistics. The FBI keeps very detailed national records on crime, but the way it presents rape data obscures the racial element rather than clarifies it. Dr. William Wilbanks, a criminologist at Florida International University, had to sift carefully through the data to find that in 1988 there were 9,406 cases of black-on-white rape and fewer than ten cases of white-on-black rape. [320] Another researcher concludes that in 1989, blacks were three or four times more likely to commit rape than whites, and that black men raped white women thirty times as often as white men raped black women. [321]
Interracial crime figures are even worse than they sound. Since there are more than six times as many whites as blacks in America, it means that any given black person is vastly more likely to commit a crime against a white than vice versa.
Notes
317. “What Should Be Done,” US News & World Report (August 22, 1989), p. 54. See also Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1987 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989), p.7.318. Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1987.
319. Gary D. LaFree, “Male Power and Female Victimization: Toward a Theory of Interracial Rape,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 88, No. 2 (September 1982).
320. William Wilbanks, “Frequency and Nature of Interracial Crimes,” submitted for publication to the Justice Professional (November 7, 1990). Data derived from Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1987, p. 53.
321. Andrew Hacker, Two Nations, pp. 183, 185.
Jared Taylor, Paved with Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America (New York: Carrol & Graf, 1992), 92-93.


7 responses so far ↓
matthew kaitz // July 25, 2008 at 1:40 pm
Blacks will attempt to seduce white women usually with no pleasing result so they take it. Black women are usually repulsive and no man wants it
Thinking Voter // February 10, 2009 at 1:19 am
It is amazing how people can refuse to look at facts .
Then again, even if no one will talk about it , somehow they always seem to have the good sense to avoid certain parts of town.
bobby brown // March 24, 2009 at 3:46 pm
yea kill those niggs. we should have left them as slaves, cos look at em now…bunch of wild chimps
Reason // April 18, 2009 at 6:41 pm
First of all, your information is extremely outdated and secondly, you have altered the statistics. The FBI’s statistics and the Department of Justice’s statistics for recent years don’t match these at all- in fact, they show that neither whites nor blacks commit a large number of crimes outside of their race.
86% of all white victims are killed by white offenders, according to the bureau of justice (www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm)
50% of murder victims are black, 47% are white 3% are Asian- also Hispanic people are considered white by the FBI. (www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cvict_v.htm) 86% of those 47% were killed by whites so your assertion that half of all crimes against whites against blacks is an extreme exaggeration.
And black on white crime has not soared- crime of any kind has not soared- the crime rate has been steadily declining since 1993.
But I guess facts don’t bother you too much.
vallance // May 6, 2009 at 11:07 am
most of the rape victims are probably confused white women who were not sure if they wanted to go home with a black guy and they were probably hoes any way and when they went home and the black man was pushy they got confused and decided to report it to the police. serves them right for going home with a black man in the first place. and being drunk is not an excuse
Yonash // May 25, 2009 at 1:32 pm
vallance // May 6, 2009 at 11:07 am
Of course vallance – lets blame the victim…
Angel // July 22, 2009 at 6:26 am
wow…i have been looking around at these rants for the past few minutes and I just cannot believe that these posts are generating comments 2 and three years later…Kudos to you ranter for creating something that will continue to stir things up long after you have moved on!
Now, I did not check your facts as did another commenter. However, I ask this although Black-on-Black crime is a huge thing why would you believe that Black-on-White crime would be lower? Is most major cities, the populations are first segreated by wealth and tax bracket. Then by race which may have somehting to do with the separation by tax bracket….now riddle me this: do you think that poor people would ALWAYS waste their time by commiting robberies and othercrimes against people who don’t have anything to take? It only makes sense that someone desparate (or whatever) enough to rob someone would want to pick a victim that HAS something! Doesnt make it right, but be serious!
Not only that…I have read in the past that rape victims usually know their assailant. Now, perhaps Black women may also tend to be disenchanted by the legal system in the US and rather to not go through with all of the headche of getting the rapist arrested if 1) nothing will happen or 2) if something does happen to him ,judgement will be dictated by the same criminal courts that deal out unequal justice to her brothers and sons…
Not to mention the perception by many that women who are raped in some way deserve it and Black women doubly so…So perhaps the stats lie (which statistics often do)
just a thought…